The question of the concept of the state is as old as it is the state itself. This question is still open. Moreover, it is believed that public life can not stop and wait for the precise definition of the state. As determined by the state at various stages of its development? What are the definitions currently exist? You can do without a clear idea of \u200b\u200bwhat state it operates and what its mechanism? What to consider when determining the concept of the state? Is it possible on the basis set out at different times of private definitions
States to develop a suitable "for all time" and "on all occasions" the general definition of the state? Explain your answer, please give examples Give your definition of the state, as you understand it personally.
In the entire history of mankind the great thinkers and political leaders from different times it was the most diverse set of opinions and judgments on the main feature of the state, which distinguish the state from other pre-state (that existed before) and private (existing along with him), institutions and organizations. What are the views and
judgments about the main features of state are known from the time of Democritus? What are the main features of state stand at the moment? Do you think modern exhaustive list of these symptoms and not subject to revision or practice a different perspective, and why?
Explain your answer, please give examples.
Right, like the state, is one of the most important, not only, but also the most complex social phenomena. With the development of society and the state, and people have changed view on the right. In the legal literature, and domestic and foreign, to date there is no single approach to the definition of law, and even more so, a clear presentation of it. The range of opinions here is very wide and varied. What is the reason? How to change the right of representation in the course of centuries? What are the current approaches to the definition of law in domestic science and abroad? Is it possible on the basis set out in the different definitions of private time to work out the right fit "for all time" and "on all occasions" General
definition of the right? Explain your answer, please give examples. Give your definition of the right, as you understand it personally.
The question of the connectedness of State and Law, the legal limits of state activity invariably caused heated debate among many generations of lawyers. What point of view, there are on this matter? Is it just the right tool in the hands of the state, one of its features, attributes, or whether it stands in relation to it as a relatively independent institution? Does the fact of publication or regulations authorizing the State of their total dependence on the state and the subordination of the state?
Almost always (since ancient times, since both appeared right) there was a problem of the relation of law. The urgency of this problem still prevails. Its essence is reduced to the following. There are laws relevant legal criteria that are considered to be "legal law". Here, the right and the law are the same. But there are laws that do not meet the legal criteria and, hence, to the right are not the same. What are the criteria for distinguishing between right and law, "law of laws" and "unlawful laws"
offered by lawyers and philosophers? What is the point of view you practice? What, in your opinion, makes a law "legal", and another - "unlawful"? How, in your opinion, relate to the right and the law? Is it possible to distinguish the right from the "law of unlawful?" Explain your answer, please give examples.
One of the hallmarks of a modern state is the loss of their tight class organization. Different classes gradually dissolve in the general social