By studying the statement of claim for the recovery of funds, the judge ob-
ratil attention to the expiration of the statute of limitations on the claimed
requirement. In this regard, the definition of the preparation of the case for court
proceedings were invited the parties to submit to the court has explained, of,
associated with the omission of the limitation period.
Analyze the situation.
Justify your answer and explanation of the rule of law supreme
Municipal Enterprise of Housing and Communal Services of ob-
ratilos to the arbitration court of the Republic of Karelia with the claim to the district
Culture department of debt collection for the consumed
electricity. When preparing the case for the trial judge
I found that the statement of claim on behalf of MP Housing signed by a person not
having the right to sign it, and made a decision to leave
the claim without consideration.
Evaluate the actions of judges.
Arbitration Court judge adjourned the hearing in
connection with its consideration of other matters assigned by mistake to the same
day. Then he proceeded to consideration of the first case.
whether the judge violated the norms of AIC?
In some cases, the judge declares a break?
After receiving the statement of the authorized body on the recognition of municipal
nicipal Unitary Enterprise "Housing" bankrupt, the arbitral tribunal
issued a decision on the adoption and introduction of monitoring. Interim management
lyayuschim Fedorov was appointed standing first in the list of candidates,
specified by the authorized body in a statement. The same definition
Court appointed a mediator to resolve the conflict and suspended
Were approved by the arbitral tribunal any errors in
acceptance of the application?
By agreeing to a trial by summary pro-
duction, the defendant told the court of arbitration an application for consideration
cases involving arbitration zasedateley.Kak should do the arbitral tribunal?
By the decision of the arbitration court to resolve the dispute was between fish
Combine and wholesale trading company on the execution of the contract of supply.
An arbitration court ordered the fish plant reimburse incurred
its losses. However, the plant has refused to execute the decision, on the grounds
I was not informed of the place of the hearing. The company appealed to the
Arbitration court to issue a writ of execution on the
enforcement of the decision, stating that the plant in the process of
examination of the case changed its legal address, and therefore summons
directed at the same address.
Is it possible in this case, the enforcement of the decision re-