Nikolai Osokin filed a lawsuit against his ex-wife Catherine to reduce the amount of maintenance paid to them for a son and a daughter.
In proceedings before the court revealed that after the dissolution of the hut Catherine with Nikolai Osokin, he is by a court to pay her child support for daughter in the amount of ¼ of his salary. Eight months after the divorce Catherine gave birth to a son Nicholas and recorded the child's father against his consent, and then filed a lawsuit for the recovery of maintenance for the newborn son in court. The court satisfied the claim of Catherine, to determine the size of the alimony ¼ wage Nicholas. Thus, the amount of support is ½ wage Nicholas instead of 1/3 defined by the Family Code of the Russian Federation.
Currently Nikolai Osokin not married, his monthly income is 3,000 rubles, while Catherine receives for his labor of 750 rubles.
Catherine Nicholas did not recognize the claim, considering previous decisions of the courts is not contrary to the law.
1. Why is the second court ordered child support for a Nicholas newborn son at a rate of ¼ of his salary?
2. Is the requirement to reduce the size of Nicholas child support for two children?
3. Is it right to objection against the claim of Catherine Nicholas?
4. What decision will the court? Explain.
Petr Sedov after marrying Alevtina Lykova lived in their own house of her mother Anne. A year after the birth of the couple's daughter Ksenia, Petr Sedov was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for five years. A year later, his wife died suddenly Alevtina. Four-Xenia stayed with his grandmother, who at the time was 55 years old. Petr Sedov occasionally sent letters from the place of punishment. After serving his sentence, Petr Sedov wanted to live in the house of his mother in law, as long as get a job, because his daughter lives there. Anna Lykov refused him. Petr Sedov said that as soon get a job, would rent a house and take her daughter. Anna objected - for her it was a blow. Peter promised to take away the daughter by a court. The girl at the time was eight years old. Anna Lykov seek advice from legal counsel.
1) Peter Sedov entitled to require the return of Anna Lykova his daughter Xenia, after a period of five years did not take part in her upbringing?
2) whether the court will refuse to Peter Sedov's claim for the return of her daughter, and in what way?
3) What will the court decision in the case, if in the course of the proceedings it turns out that neither Peter nor Anna Sedov Lykov fail to provide proper upbringing and development of Xenia?
Pupil orphanage Ulida Mirzaev June 8, 1996 she married Ilham Gafortdinova. After a year and four months they had a son Hamid.
Gulnar Yuldashev, a nephew of President Ilham Gafortdinova, turning over old letters her grandmother Zarema found out that the father of Ilham long time lived in a small village Samgaltoy the Republic of Tuva, where at the same time lived Ulidy mother later died of liver cancer when her daughter was three years old. In addition, the father and Ilham Ulidy was discovered a rare disease that could be transmitted and hereditary way. Ilham Gafortdinov such a disease suffered.
The prosecutor put in popularity Yuldashev, demanded recognition of marriage and Ilham Ulidy invalid.
The couple objected, citing the fact that they actually created a family, love each other dearly, and that the annulment of the marriage may be detrimental to the fate of their son.
In addition, there is a possibility that Ilham Ulida and still are not half-brother and sister, as her mother did not differ Ilham loyalty to her husband. The lack of relationship in their opinion is also supported by the absence of I. Gafortdinova mentioned diseases.
What should the court?
After the death of their spouses Ivanovs year-old son stayed with his grandmother, who two years later was formalized g