Criminal procedure control work

Affiliates: 0,03 $ — how to earn
Pay with:
i agree with "Terms for Customers"
Sold: 0
Refunds: 0

Uploaded: 11.07.2016
Content: Угол.процесс готовое.rar (10,01 kB)

Seller

AntonV2 information about the seller and his items
offlineAsk a question

Seller will give you a gift certificate in the amount of 10 RUB for a positive review of the product purchased..

Description

In the control operation in the criminal process provides answers to the following tasks:

Poles convicted under Part. 1, Art. 105 of the Criminal Code for intentional infliction of Mukhina´s death. The Poles did not deny the hearing that he had caused injury Mukhin, but said, defending himself against the victim´s attack, he tried to grab the knife from his hand, accidentally causing the knife hit the victim in the neck.
After the interrogation, Polyakov was questioned expert Ilyin, answers to questions related to its conclusion, according to the preliminary investigation. Then, an investigative experiment was conducted in the court session. During the investigative experiment Poles showed how the blow was struck, and the expert Ilyin in his testimony gave a scientific description of how the strike and confirmed the conclusions to which he came, carrying out forensic investigation of the corpse of the victim Mukhina, without prejudice to the application of Polyakov injured under the described circumstances, the defendant. [...]
Does the evaluation of evidence by the court complied with the rules? Describe the rules of assessment reports and expert testimony. What should the court, if concerning the key evidence in the case, there are two conflicting expert opinion?

Seliverstov investigator summoned for questioning to the witness 15 hours Novikov. When Novikov came and looked into the office of the investigator, he said: "Wait a bit, I´ll invite you." At this time, his cell phone rang, and the son said that home and apartment burst pipe flooded with water. On hearing this news, Seliverstov grabbed his coat and hurried home. Witness Novikov saw running out of the office at the top of the clothes investigator, asked, "How do I" At that he said to him: "Please wait a little more." On the way home inspector called on his cell phone to his trainee Kuzmin (fifth-year student of the Faculty of Law), and said: "Listen, Novikov somebody sitting there next to my office. Facts you know. Here, take and interrogate him. At the same time and show what you´re capable of. "
Subsequently, the defense had filed a petition for exclusion of evidence of criminal case Novikov as inadmissible evidence. Defender noted that Kuzmin, but on the orders and was an intern at the position of the investigator, however, did not accept the criminal case to its production; the investigation team on the case and was not created. And thus, Novikov was questioned improperly subject.
Evaluate the validity of the defense arguments.
What are the procedural rules for the adoption of the criminal case by the investigator to his production? What would you do in this case, in place of the investigator?

Pursuant to the requirements h. 1 tbsp. 215 Code of Criminal Procedure the investigator declared the accused and his counsel about the end of production of the investigation. The accused and his counsel made an application for access to the 12 volumes of the criminal case both together and separately. The accused separately acquainted with the six volumes of the criminal case, and its zaschitnik- with 11 volumes. Due to the fact that the defender finished familiarization with the case materials, he told the investigator that he intends to continue the implementation of the requirements of Art. 217 Code of Criminal Procedure, together with the accused. However, the investigator did not allow the accused and his counsel to familiarize with the case materials together, citing the fact that the defender is almost finished familiarization and a joint familiarization of the accused and his counsel with the case file only delay the timing of the preliminary investigation. At the same time he assured the defense investigator that he will continue to acquaint the accused with the criminal case file and will not tolerate violations of the rights of the accused.
Rate the legality of actions of the investigator. Whether the defendant infringed the right to consult the ca

Feedback

0
No feedback yet.
Period
1 month 3 months 12 months
0 0 0
0 0 0
Seller will give you a gift certificate in the amount of 10 RUB for a positive review of the product purchased..
In order to counter copyright infringement and property rights, we ask you to immediately inform us at support@plati.market the fact of such violations and to provide us with reliable information confirming your copyrights or rights of ownership. Email must contain your contact information (name, phone number, etc.)