- Arts & Culture 5856
- Business & Economics 679
- Computers 309
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 81
- Education & Science 74780
- Abstracts 100
- Astrology 4
- Astronomy 1
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 1982
- Coursework 15184
- Culture 9
- Diplomas 414
- Drawings 817
- Ecology 5
- Economy 84
- English 75
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17543
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 2
- Geology 1
- History 89
- Maps & Atlases 4
- Mathematics 13804
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 23
- Physics 14735
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 59
- Psychology 60
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sexology 42
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 145
- Tests 8962
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 7
- To Help Graduate Students 13
- To Help the Entrant 37
- Vetting 361
- Works 13
- Информатика 10
- Engineering 3059
- Fiction 696
- House, Family & Entertainment 107
- Law 132
- Website Promotion 71
Solution of the problem, an example of judicial practice and plot
Refunds: 0
Uploaded: 04.12.2014
Content: 16.doc 34,5 kB
Product description
Solution of the problem, an example of judicial practice and plot
Joint-stock company "Peter House" engaged in wholesale trade of audio and video, decided to create a website on the Internet for e-commerce and the implementation of advertising their services. As the domain name was decided to use the company name, which is also a registered trademark.
However, the provider to which the firm has requested grant it the right to administer the domain, said that this is not possible, since this domain already owns Citizen Petrov. As it turned out, Petrov is the administrator of over one hundred domains, in one way or another used the English word «house». Over the past two years he owned it peredelegiroval several domains to various firms, who are in need.
JSC "Peter House" Petrov contacted and invited him to transfer the rights to the domain «peterhouse» for a small fee. Petrov refused to do, saying that he was ready to give up the rights to the domain only for a substantial amount. Since the company is not satisfied, she decided to take away the right to Petrov disputed domain name in court.
What current legislation can rely JSC "Peter House" in the fight over the ownership of the disputed domain name?
Feedback
0Period | |||
1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 |